Skip to main content
· 12/5/1950

Wallace v. Stearns

Citations

  • 96 N.H. 367
  • 77 A.2d 109
  • 1950 N.H. LEXIS 209

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because RSA 538:1 is remedial, retrospective application of third, newly enacted sentence is not unconstitutional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnston

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.