Wallace v. STATE EX REL. PERS

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing court draws from unchallenged factual findings set out in contested case order, supplemented by the record
• noting agency’s concession “that the concept of mootness does not apply to administrative agencies”
• on review, court draws from unchallenged agency factual findings, supplemented by the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).