District Court of Appeal of Florida· 5/24/2006
Wallace v. State
Citations
- 929 So. 2d 695
- 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8098
- 2006 WL 1409362
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a finding of “possession,” as against “actual possession,” is insufficient
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gunther, Stevenson, Taylor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
- State v. OverfeltSupreme Court of Florida· 1984-10-18· cited 145×
- Tucker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1999-01-21· cited 57×
- Bundrage v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-04-05· cited 28×
- James v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-03-24· cited 8×
- Wallace v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-11-19· cited 6×
- Hunter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-09-27· cited 6×
- Green v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-12-27· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.