Skip to main content

Wallace v. State

Citations

  • 889 So. 2d 928
  • 2004 WL 2898157

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding trial court abused its discretion in accepting state’s explanation that African-American juror worked for a law firm, where state never challenged a white lawyer
  • reversing because prosecutor's \race neutral explanation . . . was not a reasonable explanation in light of the facts\ and rejecting State's argument \that prosecutor's use of a peremptory challenge was not pretextual\
  • reversing because prosecutor's \race neutral explanation ... was not a reasonable explanation in light of the facts” and rejecting State’s argument \that prosecutor's use of a peremptory challenge was not pretextual”
  • trial court erred in accepting State’s explanation that African-American juror worked for a law firm, where State never challenged a white lawyer
  • state's argument rejected that prosecutor's use of peremptory challenge not pretextual in light of fact that black juror had already been accepted on panel
  • state’s argument rejected that prosecutor’s use of peremptory challenge not pretextual in light of fact that black juror had already been accepted on panel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shahood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.