Skip to main content

Wallace v. State

Citations

  • 782 S.W.2d 854
  • 1989 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 192
  • 1989 WL 129761

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • part of evidence establishing predicate for admission of tape recording under Federal Rule of Evidence 901(a) was taken from tape itself
  • “Because appellant did not urge this argument in his petition for discretionary review, we will not address it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell, Teague

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.