Wallace v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when the allegations set forth in a motion to withdraw a plea are “conclusively refuted by the record, there is no need to hold an evidentiary hearing”
• reiterating that “where the coercion alleged is legally insufficient or conclusively refuted by the record, there is no need to hold an evidentiary hearing or appoint conflict-free counsel.”
• finding a motion to withdraw was properly denied as its grounds were refuted by, among other things, admissions in the plea colloquy
• providing that the denial of a motion to withdraw a plea is reviewed for an abuse of discretion, and if the motion is filed after the defendant is sentenced, the defendant has the burden of proving that a manifest injustice has occurred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wendt v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-09-02· cited 7×
• Gonzales v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-08-29· cited 4×
• Davalos v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-07-30· cited 2×
• Salazar v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-07-25· cited 1×
• Rivera v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-05-23
• Wright v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-01-25
• Ira Toomer v. the State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-04-30

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-01-25· cited 25×