E.D. Texas· 3/9/1989
Wallace v. Ryan-Walsh Stevedoring Co., Inc.
Citations
- 708 F. Supp. 144
- 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2422
- 1989 WL 21566
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that LHWCA section 49 did not preempt state statutory wrongful discharge claim by worker engaged in “maritime but local” employment
- holding that a retaliatory-discharge claim brought pursuant to Texas workers’ compensation act, for which compensatory and punitive damages were recoverable, did not conflict with the LHWCA and was not preempted
- concluding that the jurisprudence in this area is “unequivocally clear that the election of remedies doctrine is inapplicable because ... federal and state remedies are concurrently available and are therefore not irreconcilable”
- pre-Aaron case declining to resolve whether the LHWCA completely preempted a plaintiff’s action because the plaintiff’s claims were not even substantively preempted
- \[T]his Court holds that the question of whether a civil action arises under state workmen's compensation laws for purposes of § 1445(c) is an issue the resolution of which is committed to a federal law analysis.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- William Jones v. Roadway Express, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1991-07-16· cited 140×
- Walter Spearman v. Exxon Coal Usa, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1994-02-11· cited 86×
- Brown v. Crop Hail Management, Inc.S.D. Texas· 1993-02-03· cited 31×
- Bearden v. PNS Stores, Inc.D. Nevada· 1995-05-31· cited 18×
- Allsup v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceN.D. Texas· 1991-12-03· cited 16×
- Blackmore v. Rock-Tenn Co., Mill Div., Inc.N.D. Texas· 1991-02-15· cited 15×
- Hummel v. Kamehameha Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop EstateD. Hawaii· 1990-01-02· cited 10×
- Gomez v. O'Reilly Auto. Stores, Inc.W.D. Texas· 2017-12-19· cited 10×
- Hebert v. MID SOUTH CONTROLS AND SERV.Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1996-10-09· cited 9×
- Moss v. Dixie MacH., Welding & Metal Works, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1993-04-15· cited 9×
- Merkel v. Federal Express Corp.N.D. Mississippi· 1995-05-01· cited 8×
- Gonzales v. City of MesaD. Arizona· 1991-04-17· cited 8×
- Chatman v. Saks Fifth Avenue of Texas, Inc.S.D. Texas· 1991-04-11· cited 7×
- Roberts v. Beaulieu of America, Inc.N.D. Alabama· 1996-06-25· cited 7×
- Reddy v. CASCADE GENERAL, INC.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-04-22· cited 7×
- Farrior v. Sodexho, U.S.A.N.D. Alabama· 1997-02-07· cited 6×
- Sickle v. Torres Advanced Enterprise Solutions, LLCDistrict of Columbia· 2013-12-24· cited 4×
- Kramer v. Bouchard Transportation Co.E.D. New York· 1990-06-29· cited 3×
- Rodriguez-Flores v. U.S. Coatings, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama· 2013-06-28· cited 3×
- Jacobson v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-07-20· cited 2×
Cites
73 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1987-06-09· cited 6,547×
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court· 1983-06-24· cited 5,652×
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court· 1987-04-06· cited 3,207×
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court· 1959-04-20· cited 2,980×
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court· 1985-04-16· cited 2,375×
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court· 1941-04-28· cited 2,267×
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court· 1936-11-09· cited 2,167×
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court· 1988-06-06· cited 1,828×
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1985-06-03· cited 1,645×
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court· 1983-04-20· cited 1,382×
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court· 1962-03-05· cited 1,331×
- Hicks v. MirandaSupreme Court· 1975-06-24· cited 1,202×
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court· 1916-02-28· cited 1,199×
- Avco Corp. v. Aero Lodge No. 735, International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace WorkersSupreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 1,021×
- Farmer v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 25Supreme Court· 1977-03-07· cited 743×
- American Well Works Company v. Layne and Bowler CompanySupreme Court· 1916-05-22· cited 686×
- Lodge 76, International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionSupreme Court· 1976-06-25· cited 600×
- Grubbs v. General Electric Credit Corp.Supreme Court· 1972-04-18· cited 445×
- Davis v. Department of Labor and Industries of Wash.Supreme Court· 1942-12-21· cited 355×
- New York Telephone Co. v. New York State Department of LaborSupreme Court· 1979-03-21· cited 270×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.