Skip to main content
· 3/31/2003

Wallace v. Price

Citations

  • 265 F. Supp. 2d 545
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17761
  • 2003 WL 21295982

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that agency element is distinct from the deliberate elicitation element
  • holding no deliberate elicitation where “[t]here [was] no evidence of instruction to obtain information and no evidence that informant initiated the conversation” even where the informant was placed in a cell near defendant and they had a prior personal relationship
  • noting there was “no evidence that [the informant] initiated the conversation with [the defendant]” and upholding magistrate’s ruling that the defendant had failed to direct the court to any evidence that the informant deliberately elicited statements
  • noting there was “no evidence that [the informant] initiated the conversation with [the defendant]” and upholding magistrate’s ruling that the defendant had failed to direct the court to any evidence that the informant deliberately elicited statements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McLAUGHLIN

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.