Wallace v. Hughes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he allegation is that because GrubHub did not treat 24 Plaintiffs as employees, they never reimbursed the identified expenses. As Plaintiffs have 25 identified the expenses that Defendants failed to reimburse, the claim can proceed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).