Wallace v. Cook

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “general allegations” against a municipal defendant were “conclusory, and therefore must be disregarded” (citation and quotation marks omitted)
• declining to exercise jurisdiction over the plaintiff’s state law claims where the federal claims had been dismissed
• “[T]o survive a motion to dismiss, Plaintiff cannot, through conclusory allegations, merely assert the existence of a municipal policy or custom but must allege facts tending to support, at least circumstantially, an inference that such a municipal policy or custom exists.”
• collecting cases in which a plaintiff concedes dismissal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).