Skip to main content
· 6/1/2015

Wallace v. Alliedbarton Security Services, LLC

Citations

  • 309 F.R.D. 49
  • 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70266
  • 2015 WL 3452504

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying a motion for leave to file an amended complaint under Rule 16 where, although the moving party had acted promptly and diligently, the court found that the other party would suffer prejudice
  • plaintiff was not diligent where she could have brought “her claims under the [new cause of action] originally”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.