Wallace v. 600 Partners Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that court intervention was necessary to correct provision in lease agreement that would lead to absurd result
• \The rules governing the construction of ambiguous contracts are not triggered unless the court first finds an ambiguity.\
• “The rules governing the construction of ambiguous contracts are not triggered unless the court first finds an ambiguity.”
• \The rules governing the construction of ambiguous contracts are not triggered unless the court first finds an ambiguity.\
• “[W]e note that [the] tenant’s claim for reformation is time-barred. The six-year Statute of Limitations of CPLR 213(6) began to run in 1960, at the time the asserted ‘scrivener’s error’ was allegedly committed.”
• clear and complete writings should be enforced according to their terms

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).