Wallace H. Campbell & Co. v. Maryland Commission on Human Relations

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “federal courts have consistently interpreted 42 U.S.C. § 3604(f)(3)(B) to require a prior request”
• “Even though an agency’s interpretation of a statute the agency is charged with enforcing is entitled to deference, that deference is not limitless.”
• appellate court’s role is narrowly circumscribed and “limited to determining if there is substantial evidence in the record as a whole to support the agency’s findings and conclusions” (quoting Md. Aviation Admin. v. Noland, 386 Md. 556, 571, 873 A.2d 1145 (2005))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).