Wallace H. Bonner v. Arnold Holt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a forum- selection clause encompassing disputes “arising out of or related to” 27 the agreement covered the suit because the dispute had a logical 1 Baton, 2022 WL 17352192, at (emphasis added
• stating that Brecht “did not alter the burden of proving error harmless, which remains with the government”
• holding the defendant was actually prejudiced when jury returned a verdict of guilt only after learning that the defendant was a habitual offender, a fact that was not introduced at trial
• “[V]erbal harassment generally does not violate the Eighth 27 Amendment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).