Skip to main content
· 3/15/1868

Wallace & Co. v. Lamson

Citations

  • 20 La. 243

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • following Google and agreeing that “a state’s non-self-executing subpoena is not legally distinguishable . . . from the federal equivalent” and therefore a pre-enforcement challenge to a state non-self-executing subpoena is not ripe for adjudication

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hyman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.