Wall v. Spurlock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an adverse employment action could not have been related to plaintiffs disability when defendants were not made aware of this disability until two years after termination
• denying motion for reconsideration because the “Court did not overlook” an argument, but “specifically referenced” it “in its . . . Opinion”
• framing third element as “[p]laintiff suffered an adverse employment action because of the handicap or disability”
• “[T]he [c]ourt finds [the plaintiff] did not suffer an adverse employment action because of her disability, but instead because of her performance.”
• “In considering a motion for summary judgment, a district court may not make credibility determinations.”
• “A court commits clear error of law “only if the record cannot support the findings that led to the ruling.”” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).