Skip to main content
· 10/10/1925

Wall v. Pierpont

Citations

  • 119 Kan. 420
  • 240 P. 251
  • 1925 Kan. LEXIS 484

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding removal order did not violate Fourth Amendment or state law when it \did not specify who was authorized to take the child into protective custody\ because \the court rule permitted the officers who entered the home to take the child into protective custody\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.