Wall v. Hodges

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• even assuming sufficient evidence of the first two elements, undue-influence claim should not have gone to the jury in the absence of evidence that the named beneficiary “had anything to do with the procurement of the ... will or the [subsequent] re-execution of it”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).