Wall v. Farnham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that the relatedness requirement is “necessarily” satisfied when cases share “identical allegations of wrongdoing arising out of the same set of facts”
• holding that Rule 58 13 allows MDL pretrial court to hear and decide special appearances and noting that “[a]llowing the pretrial judge to hear and rule on the special appearances avoids the possibility of inconsistent jurisdictional rulings both at the trial level and on interlocutory appeal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).