Skip to main content
· 12/2/1957

Wall v. C. Y. Thomason Co.

Citations

  • 101 S.E.2d 286
  • 232 S.C. 153
  • 1957 S.C. LEXIS 22

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding “the language [Section 72-357 (now § 42-17-70)] is mandatory; and the rendition of judgment in such case is ministerial rather than judicial for the award is subject to review only by the appeal process to which we have referred”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Legge, Stukes, Taylor, Oxner, Moss

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.