Wall v. Board of Elections

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the General Assembly had authority to set referendum prior to statutory grant of such power
• holding that the appellants’ request to enjoin the referendum on an annexation act was moot because the referendum had been held, but addressing the merits of other challenges to the act
• holding that the appellants’ request to enjoin the referendum on an annexation act was moot because the referendum had been held, but addressing the merits of other challenges to the act
• upholding act extending city limits by annexation and changing the method of electing a city’s governing body
• upholding act extending city limits by annexation and changing the method of electing a city's governing body
• applying single subject rule as provided in the Constitution of 1976 and quoting Carter v. Burson, 230 Ga. 511, 519 (3) (198 SE2d 151) (1973)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).