Wall Investment Co. v. Garden Gate Distributing, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a plaintiffs “failure to comply with the assumed name statute does not disqualify it as a plaintiff in this suit”
• holding limited partnership authorized to sue per statute
• \[F]ailure to comply with the assumed name statute does not disqualify [a party] as a plaintiff in this suit.\
• noting partnership is legal entity distinct from partners

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).