Walker v. Willis
Citations
- 72 Fla. 119
- 72 So. 517
Syllabus
<p>Practice at Law—Appellate Practice.</p> <p>Where the appellate court finds that the court below erred in rejecting material and admissible evidence of the plaintiff in a cause, and the evidence of other witnesses on her behalf, and in striking all or any part of the material evidence on behalf of the plaintiff, and in directing a verdict for the defendant, the judgment below will be reversed.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding “no compelling policy reason to extend the Hilland rule to misiden-tification of individual defendants”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.