Walker v. Wanton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that this Court “will not cull the record to find material that the appellant had a duty to bring to the Court’s attention” (quoting Madir v. Daniel, 53 V.I. 623, 635 (V.I. 2010)) (internal quotation marks omitted)
• stating “when the underlying facts are undisputed, application of the statute of limitations presents a question of law that may be resolved by summary judgment.”
• stating “when the underlying facts are undisputed, application of the statute of limitations presents a question of law that may be resolved by summary judgment.”
• “[Tjhis Court will not ‘cull the record’ to find material that the appellant had a duty to bring to the Court’s attention.” (quoting Madir v. Daniel, 53 V.I. 623, 635 (V.I. 2010))
• discussing the discovery rule in the property law context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).