Walker v. Walker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that due process requirement of an opportunity to be heard applies where alleged contemptuous conduct took place out of presence of court
• holding that due process requirement of an opportunity to be heard applies where alleged contemptuous conduct took place out of presence of court
• “A party to a domestic relations proceeding cannot be adjudged in contempt for an out-of-court failure to abide by a court order, without an order to show cause and an opportunity to be heard.”
• compliance with order may be foregone pending disposition of appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Chaker v. Chaker
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1990-08-10· cited 40×
• In Re Appeal of Duckman
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2006-03-10· cited 14×
• Northern Oil Company, Inc. v. Socony Mobil Oil Company, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1966-11-10· cited 9×
• Martin v. Martin
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1990-06-14· cited 4×
• Socony Mobil Oil Co. v. Massena Iron & Metal Co.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1966-02-01· cited 1×
• DeWolfe v. DeWolfe
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1976-04-12

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ward v. Ward
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1898-01-15· cited 8×
• Casellini-Venable Corporation v. Rogers
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1963-06-07· cited 4×
• E. R. Wiggins Builders Supplies, Inc. v. Bathgate
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1963-05-07· cited 2×