Walker v. Sutton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that appellee was “estopped from tardily contradicting his responsive pleading, interrogatory responses and pretrial order because of [appellant’s] detrimental reliance”
• finding that appellee was “estopped from tardily contradicting his responsive pleading, interrogatory responses and pretrial order because of [appellant’s] detrimental reliance”
• estopping a party from tardy contradiction of interrogatory responses when the opposing party had relied to its detriment on the prior response
• estopping a party from tardy contradiction of interrogatory responses when the opposing party had relied to its detriment on the prior response
• consulting attorney after loss demonstrated notice of potential claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).