Walker v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a judgment of contempt is generally entitled to a presumption of correctness and that technical deviations from Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830 may be excused upon consideration of the totality of the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Peters v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-11-10· cited 29×
• Hutcheson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-06-24· cited 16×
• Martin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-04-08· cited 9×
• Haynes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-10-27· cited 6×
• Pryor v. Wille
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-11-02· cited 4×
• Tejada v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-03-10· cited 3×
• Morgan v. State
  Florida Circuit Courts· 1991-10-15
• Riggs v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-10-24

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Keezel v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-05-09· cited 22×
• In Re Weinstein
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-01-20· cited 15×
• B.M. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-03-23· cited 14×
• Kahn v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-04-11· cited 11×
• Bumgarner v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1971-03-12· cited 11×
• Fox v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-06-19· cited 7×
• Jacobs v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-02-17· cited 6×
• Glinton v. Wille
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-10-10· cited 5×
• Laremore v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-01-19· cited 2×