Walker v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where court has before it competent, uncon-tradicted evidence that accused was insane at the time of the crime, it would be manifest injustice to permit withdrawal of insanity plea
• where court has before it competent, uncontradicted evidence that accused was insane at the time of the crime, it would be manifest injustice to permit withdrawal of insanity plea
• where court has before it competent, uncontra-dicted evidence that the accused was insane at the time of the crime, it would be manifest injustice to permit withdrawal of insanity plea
• where court has before it competent, uncontradicted evidence that the accused was insane at the time of the crime, it would be manifest injustice to permit withdrawal of insanity plea

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Frendak v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-10-24· cited 162×
• State v. Jones
  Washington Supreme Court· 1983-07-21· cited 113×
• Williams v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1976-12-09· cited 19×
• State v. Peterson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-10-10· cited 15×
• Riggleman v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1976-10-19· cited 11×
• Commonwealth v. Simpson
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1998-01-20· cited 8×