Skip to main content

Walker v. State

Citations

  • 859 S.E.2d 25
  • 311 Ga. 719

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “‘decisions regarding trial tactics and strategy constitute deficient performance only if they were so patently unreasonable that no competent attorney would have followed such a course’”
  • “Whether the evidence was sufficient to warrant the requested instruction is a legal question, which we review de novo.” (punctuation omitted)
  • “Whether the evidence was sufficient to warrant the requested instruction is a legal question, which we review de novo.” (punctuation omitted)
  • “Whether the evidence was sufficient to warrant the requested instruction is a legal question, which we review de novo.” (punctuation omitted)
  • no prejudice shown where instructions as a whole covered omitted instructions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.