Walker v. St. Louis & Suburban Railway Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a judgment is on the merits if the issues could have been disposed of had the parties properly presented and managed their respective cases
• stating that “the decision may be clearly wrong, or may be against the losing party because he…failed to present his case as the facts within his knowledge, or obtainable by reasonable diligence, would have enabled him to do[]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).