Walker v. Shinseki

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that only those chronic diseases listed in § 3.309(a) are subject to service connection by continuity of symptoms as described § 3.303(b)
• holding that only conditions listed as chronic diseases in § 3.309(a) may be considered for service connection under 38 C.F.R. § 3.303(b)
• holding that a continuity of symptomatology affords a route to service connection only for specific chronic disabilities
• holding that the continuity provisions of 38 C.F.R. § 3.303(b) apply only to those disease listed under 38 C.F.R. § 3.309(a)
• holding that only conditions listed as chronic diseases in § 3.309(a) may be considered for service connection under 38 C.F.R. § 3.303(b)
• holding that only conditions listed as chronic diseases in 38 C.F.R. § 3.309(a) may be considered for service connection under 38 C.F.R. § 3.303(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).