Walker v. Russell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the assumption of risk did not “clearly, unambiguously, and unequivocally bar [the plaintiff]’s PLA claim”
• noting that “[t]he validity of exculpatory clauses releasing or waiving future negligence claims usually turns on the fourth Jones factor”
• “[I]t is well established that the PLA abrogates common law negligence claims against landowners.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).