Walker v. Penn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• warden did not complain that he was denied an opportunity to respond to habeas court’s sua sponte consideration of matter not raised by petitioner
• warden did not complain that he was denied an opportunity to respond to habeas court's sua sponte consideration of matter not raised by petitioner
• “Issues previously decided by a court of competent jurisdiction are conclusive and constitute a procedural bar to relitigation. [Cits.] The principle of res judicata contained in OCGA § 9-12-40 is also binding in habeas corpus proceedings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).