Walker v. Milliken

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “a court may take notice of another court’s order . . . for the limited purpose of recognizing the ‘judicial act’ that the order represents or the subject matter of the litigation”
• explaining that Section 1611 is a “criminal statute[] and do[es] not provide for civil remedies.”
• stating that the first identity of res judicata is satisfied regardless of whether the remedies sought are different if both actions “are based on the same transactions, occurrences and facts”
• applying Florida law and concluding that a parent and wholly- owned subsidiary were in privity
• taking judicial notice, on a motion to dismiss, of documents filed in the state court foreclosure action as central to plaintiff’s claims
• finding the parties to be in privity where one was a wholly owned subsidiary of the other and they had the same interests in each case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).