Skip to main content
· 7/17/1996

Walker v. Mathis

Citations

  • 678 So. 2d 2
  • 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7613
  • 1996 WL 397266

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming departure disposition in Anders case despite error because appellant failed to preserve the issue for review on direct appeal
  • affirming departure disposition in Anders case despite error because appellant failed to preserve the issue for review on direct appeal
  • affirming sentence in An-ders case notwithstanding sentencing error because appellant failed to preserve the issue for review
  • affirming sentence in Anders case notwithstanding sentencing error because appellant failed to preserve the issue for review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barkdull, Cope, Levy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.