Skip to main content
· 4/24/1995

Walker v. M & M Dodge, Inc. (In Re Walker)

Citations

  • 180 B.R. 834
  • 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 544
  • 1995 WL 247576

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]o recover punitive damages for violating the post-discharge injunction, the debtor must demonstrate ‘malevolent’ intent on the part of the violator.”
  • “In cases involving wrongful repossession or wrongful seizure, it has been held by Louisiana courts that such actions come under the purview of [LUTPA].”
  • award of attorneys’ fees appropriate where creditor disobeyed the post-discharge injunction for no other reason than to continue to vex debtors by its ongoing collection efforts and to oppress them
  • malevolent behavior and clear violation of injunction warrant award of punitive damages
  • “Remedial statutes such as the Bankruptcy Code are to be liberally construed in favor of the debtor in order to better facilitate the debtor’s fresh start. . . . Discharge is the legal embodiment of the fresh start.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henley A. Hunter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.