Walker v. Lanning

Citations

• 74 Wash. 253
• 133 P. 462
• 1913 Wash. LEXIS 2031

Syllabus

<p>Mechanics’ Liens — Notice—Duplicate Statements — Sufficibncy — Premature Notice — Statutes—Time of Taking Effect. A duplicate statement of materials furnished for the construction of a building, mailed June 6, 1911, in compliance with, and one day prior to the talcing effect of, Laws 1911, p. 376, § 1, amending the law relating to duplicate statements, was premature and ineffective for any purpose; since the amendatory act of 1911 was not retroactive, and the notice was not sufficient under the old law which required duplicate statements to be furnished with, and at the time of, each delivery.</p>