Walker v. Griffith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendants failed to state a claim for abuse of process where defendants only alleged that plaintiffs filed the suit with an ulterior motive and failed to allege an improper act after the initiation of the suit
• “Interpretation of the language of a restrictive covenant is a question of law reviewed de novo.”
• “Interpretation of the language of a restrictive covenant is a question of law reviewed de novo.”
• “Plaintiffs ask that we look only to the word ‘pasturing’ to determine the meaning of the covenants, as they attempt to extrapolate a prohibition on ‘commercial’ pasturing (as opposed to ‘private’ pasturing
• “Plaintiffs ask that we look only to the word ‘pasturing’ to determine the meaning of the covenants, as they attempt to extrapolate a prohibition on ‘commercial’ pasturing (as opposed to ‘private’ pasturing
• “Rule 56 does not require that a party move for summary judgment in order to be entitled to it. Thus, the trial court can grant summary judgment against the moving party.” (citations omitted) (quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).