Walker v. Florida Parole Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding notice adequate despite reference to the wrong statutory section
• \[The saving] clause demonstrates that the legislature intended that compliance with the notice requirement be liberally construed in favor of the plaintiff.\
• notice sufficient despite incorrect citation to statute that was basis for plaintiffs claim
• notice requirement in statute providing for actions against state for highway defects, unlike statute providing for similar actions against municipalities, contains no savings clause and may not be as liberally construed
• motion to dismiss not designed to test legal sufficiency of complaint
• “an action under the highway defect statute, § 13a-149, is a plaintiffs exclusive remedy against a municipality or other political subdivision for damages resulting from injury to any person or property by means of a defective road or bridge” [internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).