Skip to main content
· 5/5/2004

Walker v. Cuppett

Citations

  • 808 N.E.2d 85
  • 2004 Ind. App. LEXIS 797
  • 2004 WL 953662

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[o]pinions and diagnoses contained in medical records, although they constitute an exception to the hearsay rule pursuant to Indiana Evidence Rule 803(6
  • noting that this rule means the defendant in a personal injury case can challenge the opinion of the plaintiff’s expert regarding causation: “Doctors and other expert witnesses are not oracles whose opinions, once stated, cannot be questioned or refuted . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes, Friedlander, Vaidik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.