Walker v. Com.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “blue book” value of used cars was not testimonial because it was not prepared “for the purpose of assisting the Commonwealth in securing [Walker’s] conviction”
• holding that the introduction of the automobile industry’s blue book did not violate the Confrontation Clause because it was not prepared for the purpose of assisting the Commonwealth in convicting the defendant
• holding introduction of the automobile industry’s blue book did not violate the Confrontation Clause as it was not prepared for the purpose of assisting the Commonwealth obtain a conviction
• “[E]vidence that is not testimonial does not offend the [C]onfrontation [C]lause.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).