Walker v. Atl. Chrysler Plymouth, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that employee could maintain negligence claim against employer’s automobile insurance broker because it was “clearly foreseeable” that employee would be damaged if broker did not carry out his duty
• employee of car dealership was intended beneficiary of agreement between employer and insurance broker to procure UM/UIM insurance coverage, and thus could sue the broker for breach of contract
• request by customer to \cover us\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).