Skip to main content
· 1/19/2000

Walker v. ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY

Citations

  • 92 Cal. Rptr. 2d 132
  • 77 Cal. App. 4th 750
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 471
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 667
  • 2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 32

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Section 1860.1 of the Insurance Code bars suits “seeking damages or disgorgement of allegedly excessive premiums” and seeking “redetermination of the premium rates”
  • holding § 1860.1 immunity continues 6 to bar challenges to ratemaking decisions under the UCL and tort claims in the wake of 7 Proposition 103
  • holding § 1860.1 immunity continues 6 to bar challenges to ratemaking decisions under the UCL and tort claims in the wake of 7 Proposition 103
  • “If section 1860.1 has any meaning whatsoever (which under the accepted rules of statutory construction it must), the section must bar claims based upon an insurer’s charging a rate that has been approved by the commissioner pursuant to the amended McBride Act”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haerle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.