Walker Systems, Inc. v. Hubbell Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that law firm which was class counsel in many other FCRA actions met adequacy requirement
• finding that law firm which was class counsel in many other FCRA actions met adequacy requirement
• “The Court finds that ... the firm of Edelman Combs [is] experienced, competent, qualified and able to conduct the litigation vigorously.”
• “Robinson stands for the proposition that where the representative’s claims are weak, as compared with those of the class as a whole, adequacy of representation is in doubt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).