Walia v. Vivek Purmasir & Associates, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that while damages on plaintiff’s Title VII claims were capped, she was not precluded 18 from seeking to recover additional damages under the New York Human Rights Law
• finding that statements, including referring to plaintiff as a “whore” and “slut,” constitute defamation per se as they impute unchastity to plaintiff
• statements that the plaintiff was a “whore” and “slut” constitute 18 defamation per se as they impute unchastity to the plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).