Skip to main content
· 4/7/2014

Walia v. Kiran M. Dewan, Cpa, P.A.

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 1788
  • 188 L. Ed. 2d 757
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3585
  • 572 U.S. 1046
  • 37 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1716
  • 2014 WL 1343626
  • 2014 U.S. LEXIS 2455

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that, “[i]n compliance with [Illinois v.] Allen, Petitioner was permitted to return to the courtroom at the request of his counsel upon agreement to conduct himself properly”
  • “Although the statements by the trial judge in this case clearly expressed impatience, dissatisfaction, annoyance, and also anger, and were unnecessary and perhaps uncalled for, these statements did not make fair judgment impossible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.