Skip to main content
· 12/30/2009

Wali v. One Source Co.

Citations

  • 678 F. Supp. 2d 170
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122067
  • 2009 WL 5247505

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • granting summary judgment on plaintiff’s discriminatory termination claim where plaintiff proffered no evidence other than bare allegations
  • “[T]he Court retains some discretion to consider the substance of the plaintiff's arguments, where actually supported by evidentiary submissions.”
  • “[W]here a pro se plaintiff fails to submit a proper Rule 56.1 statement in opposition to a summary judgment motion, the Court retains some discretion to consider the substance of the plaintiff’s arguments, where actually supported by evidentiary submissions.”
  • “[W]here a pro se plaintiff fails to submit a proper Rule 56.1 statement in opposition to a summary judgment motion, the Court retains some discretion to consider the substance of the plaintiff’s arguments, where actually supported by evidentiary submissions.”
  • evaluating plaintiff’s race and color discrimination claims simultaneously

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Debra Freeman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.