Walentyna Korniejew v. John D. Ashcroft

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a “minor inconsistency” alone was not enough to support an adverse credibility determination before finding additional facts to support upholding the IJ’s finding
• holding that petitioner’s inability to explain discrepancy between her testimony and asylum application supports adverse credibility determination
• finding that a discrepancy on a collateral matter cannot \form the basis for an adverse credibility finding\ on its own
• finding that a discrepancy on a collateral matter cannot “form the basis for an adverse credibility finding” on its own
• finding that a discrepancy on a collateral matter cannot “form the basis for an adverse credibility finding” on its own
• upholding adverse credibility determination where petitioner had failed to mention in earlier proceedings that her husband had been arrested and killed for political reasons

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).