Walenta v. Mark Means Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the question of foreseeability is regarded as a question of fact for determination by the jury
• the question of foreseeability is regarded as a question of fact for determination by the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Volk v. Baldazo
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1982-08-27· cited 77×
• Meade v. Freeman
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1969-08-28· cited 58×
• Lundy v. Hazen
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1966-02-03· cited 58×
• Martin v. Clements
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1978-03-08· cited 38×
• Hellickson v. Jenkins
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1990-07-17· cited 32×
• Ahles v. Tabor
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2001-10-24· cited 27×
• Caldwell v. Idaho Youth Ranch, Inc.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1998-10-16· cited 20×
• Service Employees International Union v. Idaho Department of Health & Welfare
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1984-04-18· cited 18×
• Davis Ex Rel. Davis v. McDougall
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1971-02-11· cited 7×
• Meyer v. Brown
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1966-12-22
• Warren v. Hall
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1968-05-01