Waldt v. University of Maryland Medical System Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “it would be an error of law, and therefore an abuse of discretion, for a trial court to permit an expert witness to give testimony that contradicts Maryland law”
• identifying activities that “directly involve testimony” as the numerator and “professional activities” as the denominator in the 20 Percent Rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).